Open Access Research

Low-molecular-weight lipoprotein (a) and low relative lymphocyte concentration are significant and independent risk factors for coronary heart disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Lp(a) phenotype, lymphocyte, and coronary heart disease

Tatsuya Suzuki1*, Shoko Futami-Suda1, Yoshimasa Igari1, Kentaro Watanabe1, Motoshi Ouchi1, Kazunari Suzuki1, Ken-ichi Sekimizu1, Yoshiaki Kigawa2, Hiroshi Nakano1 and Kenzo Oba1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Internal Medicine (Divisions of Cardiology, Hepatology, Geriatric Medicine, and Integrated Medicine), Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan

2 Hanno Geriatric Hospital, Hanno, Saitama, Japan

For all author emails, please log on.

Lipids in Health and Disease 2013, 12:31 doi:10.1186/1476-511X-12-31

Published: 7 March 2013

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present prospective study was to examine whether lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] phenotypes and/or low relative lymphocyte concentration (LRLC) are independently associated with coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

Serum Lp(a) concentration, Lp(a) phenotypes, and RLC were analyzed in 214 subjects. Lp(a) phenotypes were classified into 7 subtypes according to sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose gel electrophoresis by Western blotting. Subjects were assigned to the low-molecular-weight (LMW (number of KIV repeats: 11–22) ) and high-molecular-weight (HMW( number of KIV repeats: >22 )) Lp(a) groups according to Lp(a) phenotype and to the LRLC (RLC: <20.3%) and normal RLC (NRLC; RLC: ≥20.3%) groups according to RLC. A CHD event was defined as the occurrence of angina pectoris or myocardial infarction during the follow-up period.

Results

During the follow-up period, 30 cases of CHD events were verified. Neutrophil count showed no correlation with CHD, while relative neutrophil concentration and RLC showed positive and negative correlations, respectively, with CHD. The Cox proportional hazard model analysis revealed the following hazard ratios adjusted for LMW Lp(a), LRLC, and LMW Lp(a) + LRLC: (4.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.99-9.32; P < 0.01, 3.621; 95% CI, 1.50-8.75; P < 0.05, and 7.15; 95% CI, 2.17-23.56; P < 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that both LMW Lp(a) and LRLC are significant and independent risk factors for CHD and that the combination thereof more strongly predicts CHD in patients with T2DM.

Keywords:
Lipoprotein (a) phenotype; Relative lymphocyte concentration; Coronary heart disease